Migraine is a risk factor for pseudophakic positive dysphotopsia following monofocal lens implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To identify neuroadaptation-related risk factors for persistent positive dysphotopsia (>6 months) following monofocal lens implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients of an academic institution and a private practice in Saint Louis, Missouri. Inclusion criteria were adults with cataract extraction between January 2010 and April 2021 with monofocal intraocular lens implantation. Exclusion criteria included dementia, <20/40 acuity, visual pathway damage, visual field loss, and significant pathology causing photopsia. METHODS: Participants were surveyed via telephone. RESULTS: There were 385 participants (385 eyes), of whom 66 had persistent dysphotopsia (58 positive), 298 had none, and 21 had nonpersistent dysphotopsia. Among the 58 who had positive persistent dysphotopsia, mean Pseudophakic Dysphotopsia Questionnaire 6 (PDQ-6) score was 14.11 (SD, 8.46). There were no significant differences in sex or race. Migraine prevalence was greater among those with dysphotopsia (21.2%) than among those without (11.4%; p = 0.054). History of migraine was associated with an increase in PDQ-6 score of 2.76 points (p = 0.006). Six people in each group had Visual Aura Rating Scale (VARS) scores greater than zero. Mean VARS score was 0.48 for those with dysphotopsia and 0.14 for those without (p = 0.03). History of migraine or increased VARS score, younger age, and female sex were associated with lower satisfaction. CONCLUSION: History of migraine was associated with increased dysphotopsia severity and decreased patient satisfaction. Although further study with a larger sample size is warranted, these preliminary results highlight the potential of simple questions to individualize lens choice, reduce the risk of dysphotopsia, and improve patient satisfaction.

Multicenter randomized phase 3 study of a sustained-release intracanalicular dexamethasone insert for treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a sustained-release intracanalicular dexamethasone insert for the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain in patients having cataract surgery. SETTING: Twenty-one United States sites. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter randomized parallel-arm double-masked vehicle-controlled phase 3 study. METHODS: Patients with planned clear corneal cataract surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive dexamethasone insert or placebo, and the treatment was placed in the canaliculus of the eye immediately after surgery (Day 1). The primary efficacy endpoints were complete absence of anterior chamber cells at Day 14 and complete absence of pain at Day 8. RESULTS: The study comprised 438 adult patients (216 in the treatment arm and 222 in the placebo arm). At Day 14, significantly more patients had an absence of anterior chamber cells in the dexamethasone insert arm compared with placebo (52.3% versus 31.1%; P < .0001). At Day 8, significantly more patients had an absence of ocular pain in the dexamethasone insert arm compared with placebo (79.6% versus 61.3%; P < .0001). The dexamethasone insert arm showed no increase compared with placebo in incidence of all adverse events or ocular adverse events. Twice as many placebo patients required rescue therapy, compared with treated patients at Day 14. CONCLUSIONS: Both primary endpoints were successfully met. In addition, patients receiving the dexamethasone insert experienced a decrease in inflammation after surgery as early as Day 4 through Day 45, and a decrease in pain as early as one day after surgery (Day 2) through Day 45. The dexamethasone insert was well-tolerated, and the adverse events profile was similar to placebo.

Evaluating the patient experience after implantation of a 0.4 mg sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™): results of a qualitative survey.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient experience of sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™) following cataract surgery as part of a Phase III clinical trial program. METHODS: This cross-sectional, qualitative evaluation involved individual interviews lasting approximately 45 minutes. Patients from four US investigational study sites who had previously received an insert were enrolled. There were no predesignated end points; this was a qualitative survey seeking a deeper understanding of patient experience. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were interviewed. Most patients (92%) reported the highest level of satisfaction grade with regard to overall product satisfaction. All patients described the insert as comfortable. Most patients (96%) described their overall experience with the insert as very convenient or extremely convenient. Twenty-two of 23 (96%) participants rated their experience with the insert as "very" or "extremely convenient", compared to previous topical therapy, and 88% of patients stated that if they were to undergo cataract surgery again, they would request the insert. When asked if they would recommend the insert to family members or friends, 92% stated they would. The survey found that 84% of participants would be willing to pay more for the insert than for eye drop therapy. CONCLUSION: The dexamethasone insert was found by patients to be highly favorable with regard to overall satisfaction, convenience, and comfort. The insert was well received and largely preferred over topical therapy alternatives following surgery. More extensive evaluation of the patient experience is warranted, and future studies should help inform design of the next generation of sustained release drug delivery systems.

Dysfunctional tear syndrome: dry eye disease and associated tear film disorders - new strategies for diagnosis and treatment.

Dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS) is a common and complex condition affecting the ocular surface. The health and normal functioning of the ocular surface is dependent on a stable and sufficient tear film. Clinician awareness of conditions affecting the ocular surface has increased in recent years because of expanded research and the publication of diagnosis and treatment guidelines pertaining to disorders resulting in DTS, including the Delphi panel treatment recommendations for DTS (2006), the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) (2007), the Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Workshop (2011), and the updated Preferred Practice Pattern guidelines from the American Academy of Ophthalmology pertaining to dry eye and blepharitis (2013). Since the publication of the existing guidelines, new diagnostic techniques and treatment options that provide an opportunity for better management of patients have become available. Clinicians are now able to access a wealth of information that can help them obtain a differential diagnosis and treatment approach for patients presenting with DTS. This review provides a practical and directed approach to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with DTS, emphasizing treatment that is tailored to the specific disease subtype as well as the severity of the condition.